His was the genius of common sense; saneness was the chief characteristic of his life; sweet reasonableness was from first to last an abiding feature of his mind.  He seems from his earliest days to have believed that there were two sides to every question, and, alike on public occasions or in private counsel, he never forgot this.  It was this belief that tended to make him, as he grew in thought, “as high as the Church is high, or low as the Church is low, and broad as the Church is broad.”  It was by acting on this belief that he was able, though he came into a diocese where much of the Church work had been carried out on somewhat narrow party lines, to win the confidence of men of very varied opinion, and to grow himself trustful of men from whose opinions he differed.  He broke down party-spirit in Church matters, broadened and lifted Church life to a higher plane, and to a wider and more intellectual outlook than would have been possible, had he not been essentially a tolerant man. (p. 333)….

Other traits in his character which impressed themselves upon all who came in contact with him, were his singular unworldliness, simplicity of life and motive, his honesty and straightforwardness.  He could never understand the habit of supposing that a man did not mean what he said.  It was positive grief to him to find that, for the first few years of his episcopate, there were among the clergy and laity men who evidently were inclined to look upon him with caution.  The suspicion with which Cumberland people, who remember the Red King and how he treated the Border City, have apparently ever since that day regarded men from the South country, was unintelligible to him.  But before long he won their confidence and affection by sheer hard work, integrity of purpose, candour of mind, and force of personality. (p. 336)

Full of resource he possessed a remarkable capacity for finding the way out of a difficulty.  Indeed, it may almost be said of him that he seemed to look on life as a series of mathematical problems which could be solved, given the right process.  This resourcefulness gave him an abundant cheerfulness.  It contributed to make him an optimist to the last.  The worst that happened might, he would say, have been worse, though he did not deny it could have been better. (p. 336)

Those who knew him well, knew that the deeper secret of this cheery optimism lay in his absolute faith in God.  “I have looked at the question,” he would say, “on all sides; I have thought it all over and done all I can; I have put all the head I know into it, and no amount of fretting or fuming can avail; it is in God’s hands, and I shall leave it there.  Good-night!”  And away he would go.  No matter how arduous or exacting the day had been, or how full of perplexity the morrow was sure to be, he could always sleep soundly and be ready for the morrow’s work with undaunted spirit. (pp. 336-337)

Then, again, his swiftness of seeing a point, his strength and concentration of purpose, and his determination to brush away all unnecessary side-issues rendered him at times apparently impatient of men who were weaker of will, less swift in reasoning powers, or less decisive in action.  This apparent impatience came out especially at public meetings, when men complained sometimes of the way in which the chairman did not sufficiently give weight to their arguments.  Doubtless it was irritating to have to listen, as chairman, to speakers who wasted time, and would neither understand the point at issue, nor speak to the point.  “I think, Mr. So-and-So, you mean this or that,” the Bishop would interrupt, with intent to help.  “No, my lord, that is not at all what I mean.”  “Then all I can say is that you are not saying what you mean,” would be the retort of the chairman. (p. 337)

Harvey Goodwin, Bishop of Carlisle. A Biographical Memoir, 1896)

Shut close the barn, and put the yokes away;
Ho! red-capped thresher, hang your shining
        flail;
Ho! herdsman, leave the cattle in the vale.
Shepherds, your flocks shall on the mountain stray,
And share with you the general holiday.
The girl who skims the bowl, and froths the pail,
Whose harvest brings a daily festival,—
The tinkling bell invites her, too, to pray.
All in the flower-decked church may kneel and ask
Who gave the seed, Whence came the corn’s increase?
And each may consecrate the ended task
By resting there a little while in peace.
While bowed with work old men will wondering say,
Shall we be here the next Thanksgiving day?

(Sonnets at the English Lakes, p. 32)

Would God! some gift of Pentecostal powers
    Could bid them speak our tongue and say their
            say,
    Then from each rolling cab and thundering dray
A wail would rise and shake your London towers;
Crying, “What once ran fetlock deep in flowers,
    Now doomed in maze in barren bricks to stay,
    Night brings no rest to help the weary day,
Life has no joy, death’s case alone is ours.”

Spavined and splinter-boned and sore of heel,
    Tongues hanging pained o’er bits of froth and
            blood,
        With dim, full eyes, heads hanging down,
            they come,
    The troop of silent sufferers; like a flood
Man’s pity pours to meet them; hearts that feel
        Have bid them welcome to the Horses’ Home.

(Middlesex and Surrey Express, 8 January 1900, p. 3)

As we leave the town [Ambleside] in the direction of Grasmere, we pass a house on the left, on a sunny terrace, almost hidden away among its trees, above a “careless ordered garden,” where wild flowers are freely allowed to grow, and nature has her own sweet way, and where to-day lives William Henry Hills, who has done more than most men in his generation to keep the natural beauty of our Lakeland undisturbed for the enjoyment of over-worked Englishmen. (p. 107)

In that house, built by herself, dwelt Harriet Martineau for the last thirty years of her life.  She died in 1876.  In the garden stands upon a stone pillar a sundial; beneath it the date 1847, and the prayer, “Come, Light, visit me!” reminding us of the dying words of Goethe, “Light, more Light!”  Whether as traveller in the east or west, a teller of tales to children, historian, novelist, educationist, or social reformer, her fame, though deservedly great, is not so remarkable as the power she wielded with the pen of a journalist, during the Civil War in America, in the direction of maintaining peace between this country and the United States.  One of the most conspicuous advocates of the Abolition of Slavery, she also constantly appealed for justice to the native races of India, and for many reforms at home, the accomplishment of which she was happy in living to witness. (pp. 107-108)

She had many friends and many foes.  Blackwood spoke of her work on America as “exactly the book which might be expected from Miss Martineau, giddy, self-willed, well-intentioned, and ill-informed—a book laden with absurdity, philosophy, and everything else in the world”; while the Spectator characterised it as “longo intervallo”; the best, the truest, the most philosophical work which has yet appeared on the social condition of the United States.”  I am writing these words in the very room in which she penned that remarkable book.  I wonder how much she cared then, or cares now, for the opinion of either reviewer! (p. 108)

One never passes the gate to the Knoll without being reminded that, in March, 1848, Emerson spent two days there as the guest of Miss Martineau; and that hence on Sunday he accompanied his hostess to pay a call on the aged poet, whom he had not seen for the past fifteen years.  They found the poet asleep on the sofa, and one expects that they felt it had been almost a pity that they woke him, for the old man was “at first silent and indisposed, but soon became full of talk on the French news,” and bitter on Frenchmen, bitter on Scotchmen, bitter on all Edinburgh reviewers, for neither Scotchmen, Frenchmen, reviewers, nor writers, from Jeffrey to Gibbon, could write English.  But the old bard allowed that Tennyson was “a right poetic genius, though with some affectation.”  “He had thought an elder brother of Tennyson (Charles Tennyson Turner, the sonnet writer) at first the better poet, but must now reckon Alfred the true one.”  “He had a healthy look,” adds Emerson, “with a weather-beaten face, his face corrugated, especially the large nose.”  But Emerson remembered too how Miss Martineau praised the poet, not for his poetry, “but for thrift and economy; for having afforded to his country neighbours an example of a modest household, where comfort and culture were secured without any display.” (pp. 108-109)

Other guests have made the Knoll famous; hither for her second visit to the English Lakes came Charlotte Brontë to be Miss Martineau’s guest, in the early spring of 1861.  There, on a certain Sunday evening, after many requests, the “little, quiet, bird-like lady” allowed herself to be mesmerised by the stronger will of her hostess.  There, on another day, her eyes filled with tears at the touch of that enthusiasm for justice done to the memory of the Iron Duke by Miss Martineau’s first page of the chapter on the Peninsular War, in her History of the Peace.(pp. 109-110)

Her [Charlotte Brontë’s] own account of that visit is worth repeating.  “I am at Miss Martineau’s for a week.  Her house is very pleasant, both within and without, arranged at all points with admirable neatness and comfort….  I rise at my own hour, breakfast alone….  I pass the morning in the drawing-room, she is in her study.  At two o’clock we meet, work, talk and walk together till five—her dinner hour—spend the evening together….  She appears exhaustless in strength and spirits, and indefatigable in the faculty of labour.  She is a great and good women; of course not without peculiarities, but I have seen none as yet that annoy me.  She is both hard and warm-hearted, abrupt and affectionate, liberal and despotic.  I believe she is not at all conscious of her own absolutism.  When I tell her of it she denies the charge warmly; then I laugh at her.  I believe she almost rules Ambleside.  Some of the gentry dislike her, but the lower orders have a great regard for her….  She is certainly a woman of wonderful endowments, both intellectual and physical; and though I share few of her opinions, and regard her as fallible on certain points of judgment, I must still award her my sincerest esteem.  The manner in which she combines the highest mental culture with the nicest discharge of feminine duties filled me with admiration,… without adopting her theories I yet find a worth and greatness in herself, and a consistency, benevolence, perseverance in her practice, such as wins the sincerest esteem and affection.  She seems to be the benefactress of Ambleside, yet takes no sort of credit to herself for her active and indefatigable philanthropy,… all she does is well done, from the writing of a history down to the quietest female occupation,… her servants and her poor neighbours love as well as respect her.” (pp. 110-111)

(Literary Associations of the English Lakes, Vol. II, pp. 107-111)

To Ulrich Lauener at Lauterbrunnen

Last veteran of a lion-hearted band,
        Withered of form, in spirit unsubdued,
        The conqueror of the mountain solitude,
He stood alone; his snow-seared eyes still scanned
The well-loved heights: I held his horny hand,
        That hand so sure in all vicissitude,—
        And this was he who first of men had stood
On many a virgin peak of Oberland;

And this was he who well had fenced with death,
    Who well had kept all charges to him given.
        Now he was old, his bones were racked with
            pain;
        ‘Farewell,’ I cried, ‘brave heart, we meet again!’
And Ulrich answered grave, beneath his breath,
    ‘Master, no more on earth! perchance in Heaven.’

(Sonnets in Switzerland and Italy, p. 91)